Robbins Arroyo LLP: National Beverage Corp. Accused of Misleading Investors in Recently Filed Class Action

SAN DIEGO & FORT LAUDERDALE, Fla.–()–Shareholder rights law firm Robbins Arroyo LLP announces that purchasers of National Beverage Corp (Nasdaq: FIZZ) filed a class action complaint against the company’s officers and directors for alleged violations of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 between July 14, 2014 and July 3, 2018. National Beverage, through its subsidiaries, develops, produces, markets, and sells flavored beverages in North America and internationally.

View this information on the law firm’s Shareholder Rights Blog: https://www.robbinsarroyo.com/national-beverage-corp-fizz/

National Beverage Accused of Making Misleading Statements

According to the complaint, National Beverage touted its revenue and asserted that it “utilize[s] two proprietary techniques… [that] creates growth never before thought imaginable.” The company also flaunted its Code of Ethics, which promoted a positive work environment and prohibited any type of harassment. However, these statements were false and misleading because National Beverage failed to disclose that its “proprietary techniques” lacked a verifiable basis – even after being questioned by the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission, and its Chairman and Chief Executive Officer has been sued for engaging in a pattern of sexual misconduct between 2014 and 2016.

National Beverage Shareholders Have Legal Options

If you would like more information about your rights and potential remedies, contact attorney Leonid Kandinov at (800) 350-6003, LKandinov@robbinsarroyo.com, or via the shareholder information form on the firm’s website.

Robbins Arroyo LLP is a nationally recognized leader in shareholder rights law. The firm represents individual and institutional investors in shareholder derivative and securities class action lawsuits, and has helped its clients realize more than $1 billion of value for themselves and the companies in which they have invested. Sign up for our FREE portfolio monitoring service, Stock Watch.

Attorney Advertising. Past results do not guarantee a similar outcome.

http://www.businesswire.com/news/home/20180718005789/en/Robbins-Arroyo-LLP-National-Beverage-Corp.-Accused/?feedref=JjAwJuNHiystnCoBq_hl-adS5VAKkf1zsgyV8tTPInVcgiwDl5F89IquLVWUqfRVgLxDkSKfgoruKb9yWl5as-PbWreMWuYBefATrZ0EPTVXw2Oldt-3VQjUwU4Zj5HZBSvR87oUDgbHejiywQBpbg==

Bohm Wildish & Matsen LLP, a Boutique Law Firm, Announces the Filing of a Class Action Lawsuit against Nerium International, LLC

COSTA MESA, Calif.–()–Bohm Wildish & Matsen LLP announces the filing of a class action lawsuit against Nerium International, LLC (“Nerium”) for fraud, deceit, and misrepresentation in Riverside, California. The lawsuit was filed on July 13, 2018 on behalf of tens of thousands of current and former Nerium Brand Partners.

According to the lawsuit, which is seeking class-action status, Nerium made materially false and/or misleading statements regarding the cost of Brand Partner Launch Kits. The lawsuit alleges that Nerium falsely represented that Brand Partner Launch Kits are sold “at Company cost,” but that Nerium sold Brand Partner Launch Kits for a significant profit.

Nerium’s Chief Executive Officer Jeff Olson is also named as a defendant in the lawsuit. The Complaint alleges that Jeff Olson received a significant secret “kick-back” from the sale of each Brand Partner Launch Kit. The lawsuit seeks compensation, penalties, damages, and attorneys’ fees. The suit could include thousands of current and former Nerium Brand Partners if a class action is approved by the court.

If you purchased a Brand Partner Launch Kit in California at any time since January 1, 2010, we encourage you to contact James Bohm, Klaus Heinze, or Christopher Green, of Bohm Wildish & Matsen, LLP, at 714-384-6500, to discuss your rights free of charge. You can also reach us through the firm’s website at http://www.bohmwildish.com/, submitting an information request at https://www.bohmwildish.com/contact, or emailing us at info@bohmwildish.com.

This class action lawsuit has already been filed. The complaint is available at the link here. The class in this case has not yet been certified, and until certification occurs, you are not represented by an attorney. If you choose to take no action, you can remain an absent class member.

Bohm Wildish & Matsen, LLP, is a boutique law firm comprised of attorneys with top legal credentials and big firm experience, while valuing the significance of our client relationships. In addition to representing institutions and other plaintiffs in class action litigation, the firm’s expertise includes general corporate and commercial litigation, as well as asset protection and trust litigation.

http://www.businesswire.com/news/home/20180718005230/en/Bohm-Wildish-Matsen-LLP-Boutique-Law-Firm/?feedref=JjAwJuNHiystnCoBq_hl-adS5VAKkf1zsgyV8tTPInVcgiwDl5F89IquLVWUqfRVgLxDkSKfgoruKb9yWl5as-PbWreMWuYBefATrZ0EPTVXw2Oldt-3VQjUwU4Zj5HZBSvR87oUDgbHejiywQBpbg==

Scott+Scott Attorneys at Law LLP Reminds Investors of its Investigation into Menlo Therapeutics Inc. (MNLO)

NEW YORK–()–Scott+Scott Attorneys at Law LLP (“Scott+Scott”), a national shareholder and consumer rights litigation firm, is investigating whether Menlo Therapeutics Inc. (“Menlo” or the “Company”) (NASDAQ: MNLO) or certain of its officers and directors violated federal securities laws. If you purchased Menlo stock in or after the Company’s January 2018 initial public offering (“IPO”), you are encouraged to contact a Scott+Scott attorney at (844) 818-6982 for more information.

Menlo is a late-stage biopharmaceutical company focused on the development of serlopitant for the treatment of pruritus associated with various underlying dermatologic conditions and for refractory chronic cough.

This investigation concerns whether Menlo’s filings with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission in connection with the IPO contained untrue statements of material fact or omitted material information, specifically regarding the Company’s second Phase 2 clinical trial of patients treated with serlopitant.

On April 9, 2018, Menlo disclosed that Phase 2 clinical trial of serlopitant for the treatment of pruritus in adults and adolescents with a history of atopic dermatitis failed to meet its primary or key secondary efficacy endpoints. The trial showed no statistically significant difference between patients treated with serlopitant and patients treated with placebo.

On this news, the price of Menlo stock closed at $8.17 on April 9, 2018, a 76.8% decline from its previous close price of $35.22, and a 51% decline from the IPO price of $17.00.

What You Can Do

If you purchased Menlo common stock, and you wish to discuss this investigation, please contact attorney Joe Pettigrew at (844) 818-6982, or at jpettigrew@scott-scott.com, or visit the Menlo investigation page on our website at https://scott-scott.com/investigation/menlo/.

About Scott+Scott Attorneys at Law LLP

Scott+Scott has significant experience in prosecuting major securities, antitrust, and employee retirement plan actions throughout the United States. The firm represents pension funds, foundations, individuals, and other entities worldwide with offices in New York, London, Connecticut, California, and Ohio.

Attorney Advertising

http://www.businesswire.com/news/home/20180718005074/en/ScottScott-Attorneys-Law-LLP-Reminds-Investors-Investigation/?feedref=JjAwJuNHiystnCoBq_hl-adS5VAKkf1zsgyV8tTPInVcgiwDl5F89IquLVWUqfRVgLxDkSKfgoruKb9yWl5as-PbWreMWuYBefATrZ0EPTVXw2Oldt-3VQjUwU4Zj5HZBSvR87oUDgbHejiywQBpbg==

Scott+Scott Attorneys at Law LLP Reminds Investors of Pending Securities Class Action Against Switch, Inc. (SWCH) and August 10 Lead Plaintiff Deadline

NEW YORK–()–Scott+Scott Attorneys at Law LLP (“Scott+Scott”), a national securities and consumer rights litigation firm, reminds investors that a class action lawsuit has been filed against Switch, Inc. (NYSE: SWCH) (“Switch” or the “Company”) and other defendants, related to alleged violations of federal securities laws. If you purchased Switch stock in or after Switch’s Initial Public Offering (“IPO”), commenced on or around October 6, 2017, you are encouraged to contact a Scott+Scott attorney at (844) 818-6980 for additional information. Investors have until August 10, 2018, to move for lead plaintiff.

Switch designs, constructs, operates, and manages data centers.

According to the lawsuit, defendants made false and/or misleading statements regarding: (1) Switch’s Grand Rapids and Atlanta facilities, and relatedly the yield on Switch’s capital expenditures acquiring and building out those facilities; (2) Switch’s high capital expenditures to create high redundancy levels at its facilities were not as profitable as they had been in the past, including that Switch had already spent an additional more than $64 million on unbudgeted capital expenditures during the third quarter of 2017; (4) Switch recognized $9.4 million in revenues during FY17 that it would not provide colocation services for until FY18, meaning its reported FY17 revenue growth and its FY18 revenue prospects were overstated; (5) eBay, Switch’s largest colocation customer, would not be taking possession of colocation space it had reserved; and (6) as a result of the foregoing, at the time of the IPO, Switch’s business and financial prospects were not what defendants had led the market to believe they were in the Registration Statement.

The close price of Switch common stock on the date the case was filed, June 11, 2018, was $12.96, more than 23% below the IPO price of $17 per share.

What You Can Do

If you purchased Switch stock in or after October 2017, or if you have questions about this notice or your legal rights, please contact attorney Rhiana Swartz at (844) 818-6980, or at rswartz@scott-scott.com.

About Scott+Scott Attorneys at Law LLP

Scott+Scott has significant experience in prosecuting major securities, antitrust, and employee retirement plan actions throughout the United States. The firm represents pension funds, foundations, individuals, and other entities worldwide with offices in New York, London, Connecticut, California, and Ohio.

Attorney Advertising

http://www.businesswire.com/news/home/20180718005150/en/ScottScott-Attorneys-Law-LLP-Reminds-Investors-Pending/?feedref=JjAwJuNHiystnCoBq_hl-adS5VAKkf1zsgyV8tTPInVcgiwDl5F89IquLVWUqfRVgLxDkSKfgoruKb9yWl5as-PbWreMWuYBefATrZ0EPTVXw2Oldt-3VQjUwU4Zj5HZBSvR87oUDgbHejiywQBpbg==

INVESTOR ALERT: Law Offices of Howard G. Smith Continues Investigation on Behalf of Mednax, Inc. Investors

BENSALEM, Pa.–()–Law Offices of Howard G. Smith continues its investigation on behalf of Mednax, Inc. (“Mednax” or the “Company) (NYSE: MD) investors concerning the Company and its officers’ possible violations of federal securities laws.

On April 20, 2017, Mednax announced poor financial results for the first quarter of 2017, including missed earnings. Mednax also reported that “[s]ame-unit revenue from net reimbursement-related factors is expected to decline by 0.6 percent for the first quarter of 2017, compared to the first quarter of 2016, driven by a 90 basis point payor mix shift to government payors that impacted same-unit pricing negatively by 150 basis points.” On this news, Mednax’s share price fell $5.39, or 8.1%, to close at $61.30 per share on April 20, 2017.

Then, on July 28, 2017, during its second quarter earnings call, Mednax announced that the Company had failed to complete acquisitions of anesthesiologist practices during the quarter and that any future anesthesiologist acquisitions were unlikely, citing the “challenging” payor mix combined with “continued . . . growth in compensation expense for nurse anesthetists.” On this news, Mednax’s share price fell $8.76 or 15.5%, to close at $47.73 per share on July 28, 2017, thereby further injuring investors.

If you purchased Mednax securities, have information or would like to learn more about these claims, or have any questions concerning this announcement or your rights or interests with respect to these matters, please contact Howard G. Smith, Esquire, of Law Offices of Howard G. Smith, 3070 Bristol Pike, Suite 112, Bensalem, Pennsylvania 19020 by telephone at (215) 638-4847, toll-free at (888) 638-4847, or by email to howardsmith@howardsmithlaw.com, or visit our website at www.howardsmithlaw.com.

This press release may be considered Attorney Advertising in some jurisdictions under the applicable law and ethical rules.

http://www.businesswire.com/news/home/20180718005033/en/INVESTOR-ALERT-Law-Offices-Howard-G.-Smith/?feedref=JjAwJuNHiystnCoBq_hl-adS5VAKkf1zsgyV8tTPInVcgiwDl5F89IquLVWUqfRVgLxDkSKfgoruKb9yWl5as-PbWreMWuYBefATrZ0EPTVXw2Oldt-3VQjUwU4Zj5HZBSvR87oUDgbHejiywQBpbg==

Kosmos Energy Announces Successful Arbitration

DALLAS–()–Kosmos Energy (NYSE: KOS) (LSE: KOS) announced today that its subsidiary Kosmos Energy Ghana HC was successful in its arbitration against Tullow Ghana Limited in a dispute over responsibility for expenditures stemming from termination of the West Leo drilling rig contract. The tribunal’s Final Award in the arbitration was delivered to the parties by the International Chamber of Commerce on July 17, 2018.

As a consequence of the arbitration award, Kosmos will not be required to fund Kosmos’ portion of Tullow’s liability to Seadrill, estimated by Tullow to be approximately $50,800,000. Kosmos will also be reimbursed by Tullow for approximately $14 million plus interest, related to amounts previously paid under protest as well as certain costs and fees of pursuing the arbitration.

In June 2016, Kosmos Energy Ghana HC filed a Request for Arbitration with the International Chamber of Commerce against Tullow Ghana Limited in connection with a dispute arising under the Deepwater Tano Joint Operating Agreement. At dispute was Kosmos Energy Ghana HC’s responsibility for expenditures arising from Tullow Ghana Limited’s contract with Seadrill for use of the West Leo drilling rig once partner-approved 2016 work program objectives were concluded. Tullow sought to charge such expenditures to the Deepwater Tano joint account. Kosmos disputed that these expenditures were chargeable to the Deepwater Tano joint account on the basis that the Seadrill West Leo drilling rig contract was not approved by the Deepwater Tano operating committee pursuant to the Deepwater Tano Joint Operating Agreement, and that the Seadrill West Leo drilling rig contract had not been entered into in connection with joint operations.

About Kosmos Energy

Kosmos is a well-capitalized, pure play deepwater oil and gas company with growing production, a pipeline of development opportunities and a balanced exploration portfolio along the Atlantic Margins. Our assets include growing production offshore Ghana and Equatorial Guinea, a competitively positioned Tortue gas project in Mauritania and Senegal and a sustainable exploration program balanced between proven basins (Equatorial Guinea), emerging basins (Mauritania, Senegal and Suriname) and frontier basins (Cote d’Ivoire and Sao Tome and Principe). As an ethical and transparent company, Kosmos is committed to doing things the right way. The Company’s Business Principles articulate our commitment to transparency, ethics, human rights, safety and the environment. Read more about this commitment in the Kosmos Corporate Responsibility Report. For additional information, visit www.kosmosenergy.com.

Forward-Looking Statements

This press release contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933 and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. All statements, other than statements of historical facts, included in this press release that address activities, events or developments that Kosmos expects, believes or anticipates will or may occur in the future are forward-looking statements. Kosmos’ estimates and forward-looking statements are mainly based on its current expectations and estimates of future events and trends, which affect or may affect its businesses and operations. Although Kosmos believes that these estimates and forward-looking statements are based upon reasonable assumptions, they are subject to several risks and uncertainties and are made in light of information currently available to Kosmos. When used in this press release, the words “anticipate,” “believe,” “intend,” “expect,” “plan,” “will” or other similar words are intended to identify forward-looking statements. Such statements are subject to a number of assumptions, risks and uncertainties, many of which are beyond the control of Kosmos, which may cause actual results to differ materially from those implied or expressed by the forward-looking statements. Further information on such assumptions, risks and uncertainties is available in Kosmos’ Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) filings. Kosmos undertakes no obligation and does not intend to update or correct these forward-looking statements to reflect events or circumstances occurring after the date of this press release, except as required by applicable law. You are cautioned not to place undue reliance on these forward-looking statements, which speak only as of the date of this press release. All forward-looking statements are qualified in their entirety by this cautionary statement.

http://www.businesswire.com/news/home/20180717006075/en/Kosmos-Energy-Announces-Successful-Arbitration/?feedref=JjAwJuNHiystnCoBq_hl-adS5VAKkf1zsgyV8tTPInVcgiwDl5F89IquLVWUqfRVgLxDkSKfgoruKb9yWl5as-PbWreMWuYBefATrZ0EPTVXw2Oldt-3VQjUwU4Zj5HZBSvR87oUDgbHejiywQBpbg==

Global DMR Provider Hytera Appeals Initial Determination of US International Trade Commission in Infringement Dispute

MIRAMAR, Fla. & IRVINE, Calif.–()–Hytera Communications Corp. Ltd., Hytera America, Inc., and Hytera Communications America (West), Inc. (collectively, “Hytera”) today filed a petition at the US International Trade Commission (ITC) requesting review of a Final Initial Determination issued on July 3, 2018 by ITC Administrative Law Judge (ALJ) MaryJoan McNamara that features in Hytera’s Digital Mobile Radio (DMR) products sold in the US infringe patents of Motorola Solutions, Inc. (MSI).

Hytera’s position remains that its products sold in the US do not infringe MSI’s patents, and that the initial determination is incorrect. MSI originally asserted seven patents in its complaint but later withdrew three. ALJ McNamara ruled that a limited number of claims in the four remaining patents at issue are infringed, but also determined that MSI did not satisfy the technical industry prong of the domestic industry requirement as to another of its patents and did not find Hytera to have violated the statute with respect to that patent.

During proceedings in this case, before the period for factual discovery ended, Hytera had produced for the ALJ’s consideration documents and source code related to several new designs. In addition to asking the ITC to reverse the ALJ’s initial determination, Hytera has also petitioned the Commission to affirm that these latest products are not infringing.

“Hytera is confident that our designs for our next-generation DMR product portfolio do not infringe any of the asserted patents of MSI,” said Tom Wineland, Vice President of Hytera Communications America (West), Inc. “MSI did not oppose our new designs based on six of the asserted patents.”

In June of 2018, Hytera announced a new range of features for its digital mobile radio (DMR) portfolio, including its mobile radios, portable radios, and repeaters. These new features include extending full-duplex calling into repeater-mode operation (RMO) and direct-mode operation (DMO), enlarging full-duplex coverage beyond trunking mode without requiring extra hardware. Hytera also extended its over-the-air programming capability to conventional repeater operation, allowing individual radios to be reprogrammed remotely. Furthermore, optimized push-to-talk (PTT) functionality allows users to talk instantly after PTT even before a call is established.

“Hytera’s new features for digital mobile and portable radios and repeaters promote higher productivity, help improve the safety of users, and offer a better user experience,” added Hytera’s Wineland. “They boost Hytera’s leading position in providing innovative, versatile, high-quality DMR solutions that also present a compelling value to our dealers and customers.”

Hytera’s petition before the ITC remains confidential by terms established by the Commission, which typically completes reviews within 120 days. Since the Commission has not issued its final decision, there is presently no constraint on the import or sale of any of Hytera’s products.

Hytera also learned in May of 2018 that the US Patent and Trademark Office’s Patent Trial and Appeal Board has accepted three Hytera petitions to invalidate MSI’s patents based on prior art.

“Hytera looks forward to the disposition of this case at the ITC and to resolving the series of nuisance litigations our competitor has filed against us,” adds Wineland. “Hytera is focused on innovation and prefers to compete fairly in the marketplace rather than in the courtroom. Hytera is confident that our products do not infringe.”

About Hytera

Hytera Communications Corporation Limited is a leading global provider of innovative professional land mobile radio (LMR) communications solutions to governmental organizations, public security institutions, and customers from other industries including transportation, oil and gas, and many others around the world. Founded in Shenzhen, China in 1993 and listed on the Shenzhen Stock Exchange (002583.SZ), Hytera has ten research and development centers around the world and has partnered with companies in the U.S. since 2000. Hytera established its first U.S. subsidiary, Hytera America, Inc., in 2004. It established Hytera Communications America (West), Inc., in 2016. Hytera owns PowerTrunk, Inc., and Sepura LLC, and has research and servicing facilities in Schaumburg, Ill. More information is at www.hytera.com.

http://www.businesswire.com/news/home/20180717006081/en/Global-DMR-Provider-Hytera-Appeals-Initial-Determination/?feedref=JjAwJuNHiystnCoBq_hl-adS5VAKkf1zsgyV8tTPInVcgiwDl5F89IquLVWUqfRVgLxDkSKfgoruKb9yWl5as-PbWreMWuYBefATrZ0EPTVXw2Oldt-3VQjUwU4Zj5HZBSvR87oUDgbHejiywQBpbg==

GULFMARK OFFSHORE, INC. SHAREHOLDER ALERT: Rigrodsky & Long, P.A. Announces Investigation of Buyout

WILMINGTON, Del.–()–Rigrodsky & Long, P.A.:

  • Do you own shares of GulfMark Offshore, Inc. (NYSE: GLF)?
  • Did you purchase any of your shares prior to July 16, 2018?
  • Do you think the proposed buyout is fair?
  • Do you want to discuss your rights?

Rigrodsky & Long, P.A. announces that it is investigating potential legal claims against the board of directors of GulfMark Offshore, Inc. (“GulfMark” or the “Company”) (NYSE: GLF) regarding possible breaches of fiduciary duties and other violations of law related to the Company’s entry into an agreement to be acquired by Tidewater, Inc. (“Tidewater”) (NYSE: TDW). Under the terms of the agreement, shareholders of GulfMark will receive 1.100 shares of Tidewater common stock for each share of GulfMark common stock.

If you own common stock of GulfMark and purchased any shares before July 16, 2018, if you would like to learn more about this investigation, or if you have any questions concerning this announcement or your rights or interests, please contact Seth D. Rigrodsky or Gina M. Serra at Rigrodsky & Long, P.A., 300 Delaware Avenue, Suite 1220, Wilmington, Delaware 19801, by telephone at (888) 969-4242, or by e-mail at info@rl-legal.com.

Rigrodsky & Long, P.A., with offices in Wilmington, Delaware, Garden City, New York, and San Francisco, California, has recovered hundreds of millions of dollars on behalf of investors and achieved substantial corporate governance reforms in numerous cases nationwide, including federal securities fraud actions, shareholder class actions, and shareholder derivative actions.

Attorney advertising. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome.

http://www.businesswire.com/news/home/20180717006066/en/GULFMARK-OFFSHORE-SHAREHOLDER-ALERT-Rigrodsky-Long-P.A./?feedref=JjAwJuNHiystnCoBq_hl-adS5VAKkf1zsgyV8tTPInVcgiwDl5F89IquLVWUqfRVgLxDkSKfgoruKb9yWl5as-PbWreMWuYBefATrZ0EPTVXw2Oldt-3VQjUwU4Zj5HZBSvR87oUDgbHejiywQBpbg==

CA, INC. SHAREHOLDER ALERT: Rigrodsky & Long, P.A. Announces Investigation of Buyout

WILMINGTON, Del.–()–Rigrodsky & Long, P.A.:

  • Do you own shares of CA, Inc. (NASDAQ GS: CA)?
  • Did you purchase any of your shares prior to July 11, 2018?
  • Do you think the proposed buyout is fair?
  • Do you want to discuss your rights?

Rigrodsky & Long, P.A. announces that it is investigating potential legal claims against the board of directors of CA, Inc. (“CA” or the “Company”) (NASDAQ GS: CA) regarding possible breaches of fiduciary duties and other violations of law related to the Company’s entry into an agreement to be acquired by Broadcom Inc. (NASDAQ GS: AVGO). Under the terms of the agreement, shareholders of CA will receive $44.50 in cash for each share of CA common stock.

If you own common stock of CA and purchased any shares before July 11, 2018, if you would like to learn more about this investigation, or if you have any questions concerning this announcement or your rights or interests, please contact Seth D. Rigrodsky or Gina M. Serra at Rigrodsky & Long, P.A., 300 Delaware Avenue, Suite 1220, Wilmington, Delaware 19801, by telephone at (888) 969-4242, or by e-mail at info@rl-legal.com.

Rigrodsky & Long, P.A., with offices in Wilmington, Delaware, Garden City, New York, and San Francisco, California, has recovered hundreds of millions of dollars on behalf of investors and achieved substantial corporate governance reforms in numerous cases nationwide, including federal securities fraud actions, shareholder class actions, and shareholder derivative actions.

Attorney advertising. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome.

http://www.businesswire.com/news/home/20180717006065/en/CA-SHAREHOLDER-ALERT-Rigrodsky-Long-P.A.-Announces/?feedref=JjAwJuNHiystnCoBq_hl-adS5VAKkf1zsgyV8tTPInVcgiwDl5F89IquLVWUqfRVgLxDkSKfgoruKb9yWl5as-PbWreMWuYBefATrZ0EPTVXw2Oldt-3VQjUwU4Zj5HZBSvR87oUDgbHejiywQBpbg==

Robbins Geller Rudman & Dowd LLP Announces a Securities Case Has Been Filed on Behalf of Purchasers of TAL Education Group Securities

SAN DIEGO–()–Robbins Geller Rudman & Dowd LLP (“Robbins Geller”) announces that a securities class action case was filed on behalf of purchasers of TAL Education Group (NYSE:TAL) securities between April 26, 2018 and June 13, 2018 (the “Class Period”). This action was filed in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York and is captioned Lea v. TAL Education Group, No. 1:18-cv-05480.

The Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 permits any investor who purchased TAL securities during the Class Period to seek appointment as lead plaintiff. A lead plaintiff acts on behalf of all other class members in directing the litigation. The lead plaintiff can select a law firm of its choice. An investor’s ability to share in any potential future recovery is not dependent upon serving as lead plaintiff. If you wish to serve as lead plaintiff or have questions concerning your rights, please contact Mary Blasy of Robbins Geller at 800/449-4900 or 619/231-1058, or via e-mail at djr@rgrdlaw.com. Robbins Geller has not filed a complaint in this action. Lead plaintiff motions must be filed with the court no later than 60 days from June 18, 2018.

The complaint charges TAL and certain of its officers and directors with violations of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 for issuing materially false and misleading statements and/or failing to disclose adverse facts about the Company’s business, operations and prospects, including that TAL had overstated its net income and its net income was deteriorating. As a result of defendants’ false statements and/or omissions, TAL securities traded at artificially inflated prices of as high as $46 per share during the Class Period.

On June 13, 2018, Carson Block issued a report accusing the Company of issuing fraudulent profit figures by overstating its net income, net income margin and other essential accounting figures. The Carson Block report estimated that during the period from fiscal 2016 through fiscal 2018, TAL had “overstated net income by at least 43.6%,” and “that TAL’s cumulative net income margin during this period was only 8.8% (versus 12.4% reported)” and its fiscal 2018 “net income margin was only 10.4% (versus 11.6% reported).” According to the report, “TAL’s margins have deteriorated more than ha[s] been reported,” and “[t]o cover this up, the company has resorted to fraud.” On this news, the price of TAL stock declined over 15% to close at $38.41 per share on June 13, 2018.

Robbins Geller is one of the world’s leading law firms representing investors in securities litigation. With 200 lawyers in 10 offices, Robbins Geller has obtained many of the largest securities class action recoveries in history. For five consecutive years, ISS Securities Class Action Services has ranked the Firm in its annual SCAS Top 50 Report as one of the top law firms in both the amount recovered for shareholders and the total number of class action settlements. Robbins Geller attorneys have helped shape the securities laws and recovered tens of billions of dollars on behalf of aggrieved victims. Beyond securing financial recoveries for defrauded investors, Robbins Geller also specializes in implementing corporate governance reforms, helping to improve the financial markets for investors worldwide. Please visit http://www.rgrdlaw.com for more information.

https://www.linkedin.com/company/rgrdlaw
https://twitter.com/rgrdlaw
https://www.facebook.com/rgrdlaw
https://plus.google.com/+Rgrdlaw/posts

http://www.businesswire.com/news/home/20180717006047/en/Robbins-Geller-Rudman-Dowd-LLP-Announces-Securities/?feedref=JjAwJuNHiystnCoBq_hl-adS5VAKkf1zsgyV8tTPInVcgiwDl5F89IquLVWUqfRVgLxDkSKfgoruKb9yWl5as-PbWreMWuYBefATrZ0EPTVXw2Oldt-3VQjUwU4Zj5HZBSvR87oUDgbHejiywQBpbg==

EQUITY ALERT: Rosen Law Firm Announces Filing of Securities Class Action Lawsuit Against National Beverage Corp. – FIZZ

NEW YORK–()–Rosen Law Firm, a global investor rights law firm, announces the filing of a class action lawsuit on behalf of purchasers of the securities of National Beverage Corp. (NASDAQ: FIZZ) between July 17, 2014 and July 3, 2018, both dates inclusive (the “Class Period”). The lawsuit seeks to recover damages for National Beverage investors under the federal securities laws.

To join the National Beverage class action, go to http://www.rosenlegal.com/cases-958.html or call Phillip Kim, Esq. or Zachary Halper, Esq. toll-free at 866-767-3653 or email pkim@rosenlegal.com or zhalper@rosenlegal.com for information on the class action.

NO CLASS HAS YET BEEN CERTIFIED IN THE ABOVE ACTION. UNTIL A CLASS IS CERTIFIED, YOU ARE NOT REPRESENTED BY COUNSEL UNLESS YOU RETAIN ONE. YOU MAY ALSO REMAIN AN ABSENT CLASS MEMBER AND DO NOTHING AT THIS POINT. YOU MAY RETAIN COUNSEL OF YOUR CHOICE.

According to the lawsuit, throughout the Class Period defendants made false and/or misleading statements and/or failed to disclose that: (1) National Beverage’s sales claims and the supposed underlying “proprietary techniques” lacked a verifiable basis; (2) National Beverage’s Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, Defendant Nick A. Caporella, engaged in a pattern of sexual misconduct between 2014 and 2016; and (3) as a result, National Beverage’s public statements were materially false and misleading at all relevant times. When the true details entered the market, the lawsuit claims that investors suffered damages.

A class action lawsuit has already been filed. If you wish to serve as lead plaintiff, you must move the Court no later than September 17, 2018. A lead plaintiff is a representative party acting on behalf of other class members in directing the litigation. If you wish to join the litigation, go to http://www.rosenlegal.com/cases-958.html to join the class action. You may also contact Phillip Kim or Zachary Halper of Rosen Law Firm toll free at 866-767-3653 or via email at pkim@rosenlegal.com or zhalper@rosenlegal.com.

Follow us for updates on LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/company/the-rosen-law-firm or on Twitter: https://twitter.com/rosen_firm.

Rosen Law Firm represents investors throughout the globe, concentrating its practice in securities class actions and shareholder derivative litigation. Rosen Law Firm was Ranked No. 1 by ISS Securities Class Action Services for number of securities class action settlements in 2017. The firm has been ranked in the top 3 each year since 2013.

http://www.businesswire.com/news/home/20180717006027/en/EQUITY-ALERT-Rosen-Law-Firm-Announces-Filing/?feedref=JjAwJuNHiystnCoBq_hl-adS5VAKkf1zsgyV8tTPInVcgiwDl5F89IquLVWUqfRVgLxDkSKfgoruKb9yWl5as-PbWreMWuYBefATrZ0EPTVXw2Oldt-3VQjUwU4Zj5HZBSvR87oUDgbHejiywQBpbg==

ADT JULY 20 DEADLINE: Rosen Law Firm Reminds ADT Inc. Investors of Important July 20 Deadline in Class Action – ADT

NEW YORK–()–Rosen Law Firm, a global investor rights law firm, reminds purchasers of the securities of ADT Inc. (NYSE: ADT) pursuant and/or traceable to the registration statement and prospectus (the “Registration Statement”) issued in connection with ADT’s January 2018 initial public offering (“IPO”) of the important July 20, 2018 lead plaintiff deadline in the class action. The lawsuit seeks to recover damages for ADT investors under the federal securities laws.

To join the ADT class action, go to http://www.rosenlegal.com/cases-1346.html or call Phillip Kim, Esq. or Zachary Halper, Esq. toll-free at 866-767-3653 or email pkim@rosenlegal.com or zhalper@rosenlegal.com for information on the class action.

NO CLASS HAS YET BEEN CERTIFIED IN THE ABOVE ACTION. UNTIL A CLASS IS CERTIFIED, YOU ARE NOT REPRESENTED BY COUNSEL UNLESS YOU RETAIN ONE. YOU MAY ALSO REMAIN AN ABSENT CLASS MEMBER AND DO NOTHING AT THIS POINT. YOU MAY RETAIN COUNSEL OF YOUR CHOICE.

According to the lawsuit, defendants made false and/or misleading statements and/or failed to disclose that: (1) ADT’s Registration Statement made material misrepresentations and omissions by failing to disclose historical metrics integral to appraising ADT “key value drivers”; (2) ADT’s discussion of risk factors did not mention or adequately describe the risk posed by the already occurring 75% increase in year-over-year losses, the other complete yet undisclosed materially negative 4Q and FY 2017 results and trends, ADT’s dependence on the Trump tax cut to meet even the extreme low end of its 2017 estimate ranges, the omission of historically critical metrics, and the likely and consequently materially adverse effects on ADT’s future results, share price, and prospects; (3) defendants’ failure to disclose then-complete materially negative 4Q and FY 2017 results and trends, and ADT’s dependence on the Trump tax cut to meet even the extreme low end of its 2017 estimate ranges, much less the likely material effects they would have on ADT’s share price, rendered false and misleading the Registration Statement’s many references to known risks that “if” occurring “might” or “could” affect ADT; and (4) as a result, ADT’s public statements were materially false and misleading at all relevant times. When the true details entered the market, the lawsuit claims that investors suffered damages.

A class action lawsuit has already been filed. If you wish to serve as lead plaintiff, you must move the Court no later than July 20, 2018. A lead plaintiff is a representative party acting on behalf of other class members in directing the litigation. If you wish to join the litigation, go to http://www.rosenlegal.com/cases-1346.html or to discuss your rights or interests regarding this class action, please contact Phillip Kim or Zachary Halper of Rosen Law Firm toll free at 866-767-3653 or via email at pkim@rosenlegal.com or zhalper@rosenlegal.com.

Follow us for updates on LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/company/the-rosen-law-firm or on Twitter: https://twitter.com/rosen_firm.

Rosen Law Firm represents investors throughout the globe, concentrating its practice in securities class actions and shareholder derivative litigation. Rosen Law Firm was Ranked No. 1 by ISS Securities Class Action Services for number of securities class action settlements in 2017. The firm has been ranked in the top 3 each year since 2013. Attorney Advertising. Prior results do not guarantee future outcomes.

http://www.businesswire.com/news/home/20180717005797/en/ADT-JULY-20-DEADLINE-Rosen-Law-Firm/?feedref=JjAwJuNHiystnCoBq_hl-adS5VAKkf1zsgyV8tTPInVcgiwDl5F89IquLVWUqfRVgLxDkSKfgoruKb9yWl5as-PbWreMWuYBefATrZ0EPTVXw2Oldt-3VQjUwU4Zj5HZBSvR87oUDgbHejiywQBpbg==

Robbins Arroyo LLP: Farmland Partners Inc. Accused of Overstating Revenue in Recently Filed Class Action

SAN DIEGO & DENVER–()–Shareholder rights law firm Robbins Arroyo LLP announces that purchasers of Farmland Partners, Inc. (NYSE: FPI) filed a class action complaint against the company’s officers and directors for alleged violations of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 between May 9, 2017 and July 10, 2018. Farmland Partners is an internally managed real estate company that owns and seeks to acquire high-quality North American farmland and makes loans to farmers secured by farm real estate.

View this information on the law firm’s Shareholder Rights Blog: https://www.robbinsarroyo.com/farmland-partners-inc/

Farmland Partners Allegedly Overstated it Revenues

According to the complaint, Farmland Partners artificially increased its revenue by marking loans to related party tenants. During the class period, Farmland Partners touted increased earnings “as indicative of the growth we achieved…” and the result of increasing scale and reducing expenses. However, on July 11, 2018, an on-line article published by Rota Fortunae alleged that Farmland Partners artificially increased revenues “by making loans to related-party tenants who round-trip the cash back to FPI as rent.” The report asserted that as much of 310% of Farmland Partners’ 2017 earnings could be fabricated. The report also stated there was evidence that Farmland Properties significantly overpaid for properties. On this news, Farmland Partners common stock fell almost 40% to close at $5.38 on July 11, 2018, and its Series B preferred stock fell almost 35% to close at $18.49 on July 11, 2018.

Farmland Partners Shareholders Have Legal Options

If you would like more information about your rights and potential remedies, contact attorney Leonid Kandinov at (800) 350-6003, LKandinov@robbinsarroyo.com, or via the shareholder information form on the firm’s website.

Robbins Arroyo LLP is a nationally recognized leader in shareholder rights law. The firm represents individual and institutional investors in shareholder derivative and securities class action lawsuits, and has helped its clients realize more than $1 billion of value for themselves and the companies in which they have invested.

Attorney Advertising. Past results do not guarantee a similar outcome.

http://www.businesswire.com/news/home/20180717005961/en/Robbins-Arroyo-LLP-Farmland-Partners-Accused-Overstating/?feedref=JjAwJuNHiystnCoBq_hl-adS5VAKkf1zsgyV8tTPInVcgiwDl5F89IquLVWUqfRVgLxDkSKfgoruKb9yWl5as-PbWreMWuYBefATrZ0EPTVXw2Oldt-3VQjUwU4Zj5HZBSvR87oUDgbHejiywQBpbg==

EQUITY ALERT: Rosen Law Firm Announces Investigation of Securities Claims Against ACADIA Pharmaceuticals Inc. – ACAD

NEW YORK–()–Rosen Law Firm, a global investor rights law firm, announces it is investigating potential securities claims on behalf of shareholders of ACADIA Pharmaceuticals Inc. (NASDAQ:ACAD) resulting from allegations that ACADIA may have issued materially misleading business information to the investing public.

On April 9, 2018, CNN issued a report that raised questions about whether ACADIA’s Nuplazid treatment played a role in the deaths of sick and elderly patients. On this news, shares of ACADIA fell $5.03 or over 23% to close at $16.50 per share on April 9, 2018.

Then, on July 9, 2018, The Southern Investigative Reporting Foundation issued a report stating that ACADIA’s “pursuit of regulatory approval is best described as ‘loophole-centric.’” On this news, shares of ACADIA fell $1.21 or over 6.7% to close at $16.63 per share on July 9, 2018.

Rosen Law Firm is preparing a class action lawsuit to recover losses suffered by ACADIA investors. If you purchased shares of ACADIA please visit the firm’s website at http://www.rosenlegal.com/cases-1376.html to join the class action. You may also contact Phillip Kim or Zachary Halper of Rosen Law Firm toll free at 866-767-3653 or via email at pkim@rosenlegal.com or zhalper@rosenlegal.com.

Follow us for updates on LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/company/the-rosen-law-firm or on Twitter: https://twitter.com/rosen_firm.

Rosen Law Firm represents investors throughout the globe, concentrating its practice in securities class actions and shareholder derivative litigation. Rosen Law Firm was Ranked No. 1 by ISS Securities Class Action Services for number of securities class action settlements in 2017. The firm has been ranked in the top 3 each year since 2013.

Attorney Advertising. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome.

http://www.businesswire.com/news/home/20180717005990/en/EQUITY-ALERT-Rosen-Law-Firm-Announces-Investigation/?feedref=JjAwJuNHiystnCoBq_hl-adS5VAKkf1zsgyV8tTPInVcgiwDl5F89IquLVWUqfRVgLxDkSKfgoruKb9yWl5as-PbWreMWuYBefATrZ0EPTVXw2Oldt-3VQjUwU4Zj5HZBSvR87oUDgbHejiywQBpbg==

TAL ALERT NOTICE: Rosen Law Firm Reminds TAL Education Group Investors of Important Deadline in Class Action – TAL

NEW YORK–()–Rosen Law Firm, a global investor rights law firm, reminds purchasers of the securities of TAL Education Group (NYSE: TAL) between April 26, 2018 and June 13, 2018, both dates inclusive (the “Class Period”) of the August 17, 2018 lead plaintiff deadline in the class action. The lawsuit seeks to recover damages for TAL Education investors under the federal securities laws.

To join the TAL Education class action, go to http://www.rosenlegal.com/cases-1359.html or call Phillip Kim, Esq. or Zachary Halper, Esq. toll-free at 866-767-3653 or email pkim@rosenlegal.com or zhalper@rosenlegal.com for information on the class action.

NO CLASS HAS YET BEEN CERTIFIED IN THE ABOVE ACTION. UNTIL A CLASS IS CERTIFIED, YOU ARE NOT REPRESENTED BY COUNSEL UNLESS YOU RETAIN ONE. YOU MAY ALSO REMAIN AN ABSENT CLASS MEMBER AND DO NOTHING AT THIS POINT. YOU MAY RETAIN COUNSEL OF YOUR CHOICE.

According to the lawsuit, throughout the Class Period defendants made false and/or misleading statements and/or failed to disclose that: (1) TAL overstated its net income; (2) TAL’s net income was deteriorating; and (3) as a result, defendants’ statements about TAL’s business, operations, and prospects were materially false and/or misleading and/or lacked a reasonable basis. When the true details entered the market, the lawsuit claims that investors suffered damages.

A class action lawsuit has already been filed. If you wish to serve as lead plaintiff, you must move the Court no later than August 17, 2018. A lead plaintiff is a representative party acting on behalf of other class members in directing the litigation. If you wish to join the litigation, go to http://www.rosenlegal.com/cases-1359.html to join the class action. You may also contact Phillip Kim or Zachary Halper of Rosen Law Firm toll free at 866-767-3653 or via email at pkim@rosenlegal.com or zhalper@rosenlegal.com.

Follow us for updates on LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/company/the-rosen-law-firm or on Twitter: https://twitter.com/rosen_firm.

Rosen Law Firm represents investors throughout the globe, concentrating its practice in securities class actions and shareholder derivative litigation. Rosen Law Firm was Ranked No. 1 by ISS Securities Class Action Services for number of securities class action settlements in 2017. The firm has been ranked in the top 3 each year since 2013. Attorney Advertising. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome.

http://www.businesswire.com/news/home/20180717005835/en/TAL-ALERT-NOTICE-Rosen-Law-Firm-Reminds/?feedref=JjAwJuNHiystnCoBq_hl-adS5VAKkf1zsgyV8tTPInVcgiwDl5F89IquLVWUqfRVgLxDkSKfgoruKb9yWl5as-PbWreMWuYBefATrZ0EPTVXw2Oldt-3VQjUwU4Zj5HZBSvR87oUDgbHejiywQBpbg==

Robbins Arroyo LLP: Prothena Corporation Public Limited Company (PRTA) Misled Shareholders According to a Recently Filed Class Action

SAN DIEGO & DUN LAOGHAIRE, Ireland–()–Shareholder rights law firm Robbins Arroyo LLP reminds shareholders that purchasers of Prothena Corporation Public Limited Company (NasdaqGS: PRTA) filed a class action complaint against the company’s officers and directors for alleged violations of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 between October 15, 2015 and April 20, 2018. Prothena develops and sells novel immunotherapy treatment. Prothena’s principal asset – NEOD001 – is a monoclonal antibody designed to treat amyloid light chain amyloidosis (“AL amyloidosis”), which can lead to organ failure and death.

View this information on the law firm’s Shareholder Rights Blog: https://www.robbinsarroyo.com/prothena-corporation-public-limited-company-july-2018

Prothena Accused of Misrepresenting Its Drug’s Prospects for Approval

According to the complaint, Prothena officials touted the “exciting findings” of Prothena’s ongoing Phase 1/2 clinical study of NEOD001 as evidence that the drug was effective. Prothena even stated that the results showed improvements in all three organ systems measured in the study and led investors to believe that NEOD001 would obtain final approval after completion of the studies. However, Prothena withheld trial data that showed NEOD001 was not an effective treatment for AL amyloidosis and created the false impression that the drug was effective. On April 23, 2018, Prothena announced it was ending all development of NEOD001 after data from its Phase 2b PRONTO trial showed that the drug failed to reach either its primary or secondary endpoints and was substantially less effective than a placebo. On this news, Prothena’s stock plummeted nearly 69%, closing at $11.50 per share on April 23, 2018, and has yet to regain its lost value.

Prothena Shareholders Have Legal Options

Concerned shareholders who would like more information about their rights and potential remedies can contact attorney Leonid Kandinov at (800) 350-6003, LKandinov@robbinsarroyo.com, or via the shareholder information form on the firm’s website.

Robbins Arroyo LLP is a nationally recognized leader in shareholder rights law. The firm represents individual and institutional investors in shareholder derivative and securities class action lawsuits, and has helped its clients realize more than $1 billion of value for themselves and the companies in which they have invested.

Attorney Advertising. Past results do not guarantee a similar outcome.

http://www.businesswire.com/news/home/20180717005933/en/Robbins-Arroyo-LLP-Prothena-Corporation-Public-Limited/?feedref=JjAwJuNHiystnCoBq_hl-adS5VAKkf1zsgyV8tTPInVcgiwDl5F89IquLVWUqfRVgLxDkSKfgoruKb9yWl5as-PbWreMWuYBefATrZ0EPTVXw2Oldt-3VQjUwU4Zj5HZBSvR87oUDgbHejiywQBpbg==

Glancy Prongay & Murray LLP Continues Investigation on Behalf of Farmland Partners Inc. Investors (FPI)

LOS ANGELES–()–Glancy Prongay & Murray LLP (“GPM”) continues its an investigation on behalf of Farmland Partners Inc. (“Farmland” or the “Company”) (NYSE: FPI) investors concerning the Company and its officers’ possible violations of federal securities laws.

If you are a shareholder who suffered a loss, click here to participate.

On July 11, 2018, Rota Fortunae published a report alleging that Farmland artificially increased revenues by making loans to related-party tenants who round-tripped the cash back to Farmland as rent. The report also claimed that Farmland neglected to disclose that the majority of its loans were made to two members of its management team. On this news, Farmland’s share price fell nearly 40% on July 11, 2018, thereby injuring investors.

Follow us for updates on Twitter: twitter.com/GPM_LLP.

If you purchased Farmland securities, have information or would like to learn more about these claims, or have any questions concerning this announcement or your rights or interests with respect to these matters, please contact Lesley Portnoy, Esquire, of GPM, 1925 Century Park East, Suite 2100, Los Angeles, California 90067 at 310-201-9150, Toll-Free at 888-773-9224, by email to shareholders@glancylaw.com, or visit our website at www.glancylaw.com. If you inquire by email please include your mailing address, telephone number and number of shares purchased.

This press release may be considered Attorney Advertising in some jurisdictions under the applicable law and ethical rules.

http://www.businesswire.com/news/home/20180717005406/en/Glancy-Prongay-Murray-LLP-Continues-Investigation-Behalf/?feedref=JjAwJuNHiystnCoBq_hl-adS5VAKkf1zsgyV8tTPInVcgiwDl5F89IquLVWUqfRVgLxDkSKfgoruKb9yWl5as-PbWreMWuYBefATrZ0EPTVXw2Oldt-3VQjUwU4Zj5HZBSvR87oUDgbHejiywQBpbg==

Glancy Prongay & Murray LLP Continues Investigation on Behalf of ACADIA Pharmaceuticals Inc. Investors (ACAD)

LOS ANGELES–()–Glancy Prongay & Murray LLP (“GPM”) continues its investigation on behalf of ACADIA Pharmaceuticals Inc. (“ACADIA” or the “Company”) (NASDAQACAD) investors concerning the Company and its officers’ possible violations of federal securities laws.

If you are a shareholder who suffered a loss, click here to participate.

On April 9, 2018, CNN reported that “[p]hysicians, medical researchers and other experts told CNN that they worried that [Nuplazid] had been approved too quickly, based on too little evidence that it was safe or effective.” On this news, ACADIA’s share price fell more than 23% on April 9, 2018, thereby injuring investors.

Then, on April 25, 2018, CNN reported that the U.S. Food and Drug Administration was re-examining the safety of Nuplazid, which was approved “despite concerns that not enough was known about the drug’s risks.” On this news, ACADIA’s share price fell nearly 22% on April 25, 2018, thereby further injuring investors.

Follow us for updates on Twitter: twitter.com/GPM_LLP.

If you purchased ACADIA securities, have information or would like to learn more about these claims, or have any questions concerning this announcement or your rights or interests with respect to these matters, please contact Lesley Portnoy, Esquire, of GPM, 1925 Century Park East, Suite 2100, Los Angeles, California 90067 at 310-201-9150, Toll-Free at 888-773-9224, by email to shareholders@glancylaw.com, or visit our website at www.glancylaw.com. If you inquire by email please include your mailing address, telephone number and number of shares purchased.

This press release may be considered Attorney Advertising in some jurisdictions under the applicable law and ethical rules.

http://www.businesswire.com/news/home/20180717005054/en/Glancy-Prongay-Murray-LLP-Continues-Investigation-Behalf/?feedref=JjAwJuNHiystnCoBq_hl-adS5VAKkf1zsgyV8tTPInVcgiwDl5F89IquLVWUqfRVgLxDkSKfgoruKb9yWl5as-PbWreMWuYBefATrZ0EPTVXw2Oldt-3VQjUwU4Zj5HZBSvR87oUDgbHejiywQBpbg==

Scott+Scott Attorneys at Law LLP Alerts Investors to the Filing of Securities Class Action Against Farmland Partners, Inc. (FPI)

NEW YORK–()–Scott+Scott Attorneys at Law LLP (“Scott+Scott”), a national securities and consumer rights litigation firm, is notifying investors that a class action lawsuit has been filed against Farmland Partners, Inc. (NYSE:FPI) (“Farmland Partners” or the “Company”) and other defendants, related to alleged violations of federal securities laws. If you purchased Farmland Partners stock between May 9, 2017 and July 10, 2018, you are encouraged to contact a Scott+Scott attorney at (844) 818-6982 for additional information.

Farmland Partners is a real estate company that owns and seeks to acquire high-quality North American farmland and makes loans to farmers secured by farm real estate. Farmland purports to own or have under contract over 166,000 acres in 17 states.

According to the lawsuit, throughout the Class Period defendants made false and/or misleading statements and/or failed to disclose that: (1) Farmland Partners artificially increased its revenues by making loans to related party tenants; (2) as a result of the foregoing, Farmland Partners’ Class Period revenues were overstated; and (3) as a result, Farmland Partners’ public statements were materially false and misleading at all relevant times.

On July 11, 2018, Rota Fortunae published an online report on the website Seeking Alpha entitled “Farmland Partners: Loans to Related-Party Tenants Introduce Significant Risk Of Insolvency – Shares Uninvestible.” The report alleged that Farmland Partners artificially increased revenues “by making loans to related-party tenants who round-trip the cash back to FPI as rent and interest revenue.” The Company also “significantly overpaid for properties” and “neglected to disclose that the majority of its loans have been made to two members of the management team.”

On this news, the price of Farmland Partners common stock fell $3.37, nearly 39%, to close at $5.28 on July 11, 2018, and the price of Farmland Partners Series B preferred stock fell $6.42, or approximately 26%, to close at $18.15 on July 11, 2018.

What You Can Do

If you purchased Farmland Partners shares between May 9, 2017 and July 10, 2018, inclusive, or if you have questions about this notice or your legal rights, please contact attorney Joe Pettigrew at (844) 818-6982, or at jpettigrew@scott-scott.com. Investors have until September 10, 2018, to move for lead plaintiff.

About Scott+Scott Attorneys at Law LLP

Scott+Scott has significant experience in prosecuting major securities, antitrust, and employee retirement plan actions throughout the United States. The firm represents pension funds, foundations, individuals, and other entities worldwide with offices in New York, London, Connecticut, California, and Ohio.

Attorney Advertising

http://www.businesswire.com/news/home/20180717005186/en/ScottScott-Attorneys-Law-LLP-Alerts-Investors-Filing/?feedref=JjAwJuNHiystnCoBq_hl-adS5VAKkf1zsgyV8tTPInVcgiwDl5F89IquLVWUqfRVgLxDkSKfgoruKb9yWl5as-PbWreMWuYBefATrZ0EPTVXw2Oldt-3VQjUwU4Zj5HZBSvR87oUDgbHejiywQBpbg==

Robbins Arroyo LLP Is Investigating the Officers and Directors of NN, Inc. (NNBR) on Behalf of Shareholders

SAN DIEGO & JOHNSON CITY, Tenn.–()–Shareholder rights law firm Robbins Arroyo LLP is investigating whether certain officers and directors of NN, Inc. (NasdaqGS: NNBR) breached their fiduciary duties to shareholders. NN, Inc., a diversified industrial company, manufactures high precision bearing components, industrial plastic products, and precision metal components to various markets in North America, Western Europe, Eastern Europe, South America, and China.

View this press release on the firm’s Shareholder Rights Blog: https://www.robbinsarroyo.com/nn-inc-july-2018/

NN, Inc. Shareholders Have Legal Options

Concerned shareholders who would like more information about their rights and potential remedies can contact attorney Leonid Kandinov at (800) 350-6003, LKandinov@robbinsarroyo.com, or via the shareholder information form on the firm’s website.

Robbins Arroyo LLP is a nationally recognized leader in shareholder rights law. The firm represents individual and institutional investors in shareholder derivative and securities class action lawsuits, and has helped its clients realize more than $1 billion of value for themselves and the companies in which they have invested.

Attorney Advertising. Past results do not guarantee a similar outcome.

http://www.businesswire.com/news/home/20180716005906/en/Robbins-Arroyo-LLP-Investigating-Officers-Directors-NN/?feedref=JjAwJuNHiystnCoBq_hl-adS5VAKkf1zsgyV8tTPInVcgiwDl5F89IquLVWUqfRVgLxDkSKfgoruKb9yWl5as-PbWreMWuYBefATrZ0EPTVXw2Oldt-3VQjUwU4Zj5HZBSvR87oUDgbHejiywQBpbg==